So, only a few weeks behind the whole rest of the internet, I saw the Avengers.
Things That Are Clearly The Best:
* Natasha Romonov
* Robert Downey Jr.
* Samuel R. Jackson
* this incarnation of Bruce Banner
* the giant segmented worm things (flying biomechanical monsters ftw!)
* Enver!!! (There may have been flailing. I'd heard he had a bit part, but I forgot.)
Other observations:
* Captain America is very nicely shaped
* Why only one woman, Avengers?
* Thor would like to be Eomer, but he isn't cool enough. He's the shiny Halloween costume version of Eomer.
Edit: and two more observations I thought of later:
* I can kind of see why the fandom for this movie exploded the way it has: so many delightful people having such excellent chemistry with each other.
* And Joss Whedon finally hits the big time. Good on him.
Plotwise, I thought this was an unsurprisingly stupid movie. I generally couldn't figure out why people did the things they did, in terms of either tactics or strategy. But then, the plots in these things never make all that much sense. Nor was I impressed with the big explosions or the big music.
However, I went because I was promised character moments, and I did indeed enjoy those very much. I would happily watch half a movie of Tony Stark and Bruce Banner in a lab ragging each other and geeking out, with Steve Rogers, earnest and culturally obtuse, standing around as foil. And Scarlett Johansson was epic.
Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (
DW replies)
Things That Are Clearly The Best:
* Natasha Romonov
* Robert Downey Jr.
* Samuel R. Jackson
* this incarnation of Bruce Banner
* the giant segmented worm things (flying biomechanical monsters ftw!)
* Enver!!! (There may have been flailing. I'd heard he had a bit part, but I forgot.)
Other observations:
* Captain America is very nicely shaped
* Why only one woman, Avengers?
* Thor would like to be Eomer, but he isn't cool enough. He's the shiny Halloween costume version of Eomer.
Edit: and two more observations I thought of later:
* I can kind of see why the fandom for this movie exploded the way it has: so many delightful people having such excellent chemistry with each other.
* And Joss Whedon finally hits the big time. Good on him.
Plotwise, I thought this was an unsurprisingly stupid movie. I generally couldn't figure out why people did the things they did, in terms of either tactics or strategy. But then, the plots in these things never make all that much sense. Nor was I impressed with the big explosions or the big music.
However, I went because I was promised character moments, and I did indeed enjoy those very much. I would happily watch half a movie of Tony Stark and Bruce Banner in a lab ragging each other and geeking out, with Steve Rogers, earnest and culturally obtuse, standing around as foil. And Scarlett Johansson was epic.
Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 06:30 am (UTC)I thought Samuel L Jackson was awful, frankly. He's a badass when he gets to just play Samuel L, but imo he did not seem to be able to pull off Whedon's lines. This is a shame because I really like the idea of Fury.
Agree about plots and explosions. Didn't notice music, which is a plus. I would definitely prefer to watch Tony/Bruce
foreverwith Steve Rogersforeverespecially with all of the Natashawith Bruce, forever.I really do hope we get a Black Widow movie out of this. Especially one that doesn't suck; I thought SJ and the Natasha character in Ironman 2 were horrible and I was not in the least interested in seeing more. But hey that was how I felt about all of Ironman 2.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 04:59 pm (UTC)Didn't notice music, which is a plus. I would definitely prefer to watch Tony/Bruce forever with Steve Rogers forever especially with all of the Natasha with Bruce, forever.
Yup yup. And now I can go read your fic! I gotta say, about 80% of my motivation for seeing this movie was that I could go read all my friends' fic afterwards.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 01:08 pm (UTC)Thor, though. I much prefer Chris Hemsworth as George Kirk. He's too Ken doll as Thor.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:04 pm (UTC)I find your Ken doll comment amusing, since Chris Evans as Steve Rogers is like the epitome of Ken doll. He makes it work for him, though; there's no room for that shininess in Thor.
It doesn't help that I find the whole Thor/Loki/Asgard 'mythology' silly in the extreme.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-26 03:50 pm (UTC)Thor would like to be Eomer, but he isn't cool enough. He's the shiny Halloween costume version of Eomer.
I can see why you'd think this. Have you seen the Thor movie, though? He's actually HILARIOUS.
Superhero movies always have stupid plots. I've learned to just go with it.
I would happily watch half a movie of Tony Stark and Bruce Banner in a lab ragging each other and geeking out, with Steve Rogers, earnest and culturally obtuse, standing around as foil. And Scarlett Johansson was epic.
DO WANT.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-26 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-26 10:22 pm (UTC)