SPN: The Benders and Shadow
Mar. 16th, 2011 10:11 pmOkay, y'all. I realize I'm jumping the gun and it's probably way too early to expect it, but I'm ready for this show to start telling different stories. Something more than "beat the evil bad spirit thingy, angst about John Winchester."
Like, can we have an ep from an outside POV? The Winchester boys are pretty threatening, really, with their habitual lying and their car trunk full of guns. Not to mention they'd come across as more than a bit cracked. Or maybe an ep that's really all about the credit card fraud and the umpteen fake ID's. Or an ep where the supernatural thingy isn't really evil?
Question your assumptions, show!
The Benders
At first I thought these might be, like, spoon-benders, playing off Dean's remark in the previous episode. Failing that, I hear there are folks that can bend the four elements. They're pretty cool. You should check 'em out.
As near as I can figure, though, Bender must be the family's name, although I can't recall hearing it said.
So we got to the hillbilly cannibal episode, I guess, although it was really more about the hunting; I suspect the reasoning behind the cannibalism was something along the lines of, "You kill it, you eat it."
I gotta say, I'm offended on behalf of Minnesotans and of folks who hunt and, hey, I'm offended on behalf of hillbillies. I feel I should point out that these particular hillbillies were apparently transplanted from parts east or south; the only person in the whole ep who sounded even vaguely midwestern to me was the kid witness at the beginning.
I sort of liked the lady cop and I loved when she handcuffed Dean to the car; that boy needs all the ego-pokes the universe can dish out. I was miffed, though, that she in fact wasn't able to handle it all herself.
Meh, basically. Meh.
Shadow
This felt less like a full story than it did a pit stop in the larger arc. I can't say we've learned anything more on the thing-that-killed-Mary front, only confirmed what we already knew: that John Winchester has been getting close, and that the thing's gunning for him.
I'm trying to decide how I feel about the reasoning for John and the boys staying apart. He lets his guard down when they're around? Really? His boys are nearby and he's less vigilant than usual? I can see the argument that someone might take the boys and use them against him, just like they were taken this time, except wouldn't it be even easier to nab them if they're five states away from him?
I dunno. I'm just not sure I buy the argument that they're more vulnerable together. If Sam and Dean were civilians, maybe, but they've spent the last six or seven months holding their own and saving each others' hides. Does John Winchester's hide never need saving?
It all sounds like isolation as an ideology to me. I remain skeptical.
Of course, whether right or wrong, the real impact is in the fact that's it's Dean arguing for the separation when we just saw him panicking about Sam splitting up the family again.
Aw, Dean. *pat pat*
Like, can we have an ep from an outside POV? The Winchester boys are pretty threatening, really, with their habitual lying and their car trunk full of guns. Not to mention they'd come across as more than a bit cracked. Or maybe an ep that's really all about the credit card fraud and the umpteen fake ID's. Or an ep where the supernatural thingy isn't really evil?
Question your assumptions, show!
The Benders
At first I thought these might be, like, spoon-benders, playing off Dean's remark in the previous episode. Failing that, I hear there are folks that can bend the four elements. They're pretty cool. You should check 'em out.
As near as I can figure, though, Bender must be the family's name, although I can't recall hearing it said.
So we got to the hillbilly cannibal episode, I guess, although it was really more about the hunting; I suspect the reasoning behind the cannibalism was something along the lines of, "You kill it, you eat it."
I gotta say, I'm offended on behalf of Minnesotans and of folks who hunt and, hey, I'm offended on behalf of hillbillies. I feel I should point out that these particular hillbillies were apparently transplanted from parts east or south; the only person in the whole ep who sounded even vaguely midwestern to me was the kid witness at the beginning.
I sort of liked the lady cop and I loved when she handcuffed Dean to the car; that boy needs all the ego-pokes the universe can dish out. I was miffed, though, that she in fact wasn't able to handle it all herself.
Meh, basically. Meh.
Shadow
This felt less like a full story than it did a pit stop in the larger arc. I can't say we've learned anything more on the thing-that-killed-Mary front, only confirmed what we already knew: that John Winchester has been getting close, and that the thing's gunning for him.
I'm trying to decide how I feel about the reasoning for John and the boys staying apart. He lets his guard down when they're around? Really? His boys are nearby and he's less vigilant than usual? I can see the argument that someone might take the boys and use them against him, just like they were taken this time, except wouldn't it be even easier to nab them if they're five states away from him?
I dunno. I'm just not sure I buy the argument that they're more vulnerable together. If Sam and Dean were civilians, maybe, but they've spent the last six or seven months holding their own and saving each others' hides. Does John Winchester's hide never need saving?
It all sounds like isolation as an ideology to me. I remain skeptical.
Of course, whether right or wrong, the real impact is in the fact that's it's Dean arguing for the separation when we just saw him panicking about Sam splitting up the family again.
DEAN: I don't want you to leave the second this is all over.
SAM: What is your problem?
DEAN: Why do you think I drag you all over the place? Why do you think I went and got you in Stanford in the first place?
SAM: Because Dad was in trouble. Because you wanted to get the thing that killed Mom.
DEAN: Well, yeah, but not just that. You and me and Dad, I wanted us to be together again. I wanted us to be a family again.
Aw, Dean. *pat pat*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 05:34 am (UTC)The types of episode you suggest (the self-referential ones, anyway) may still be a ways off. I think you're creeping up on some vampire action, though, and it's always fun to compare and contrast vampire lore between universes. Is that too spoilery? If so, may I just say "Ooops?"
The family dynamics always seem to be drawn out just until the point you're rolling your eyes, and a little beyond, and then something gives, generally. I was watching a Korean soap opera with my sick kid this weekend, and the same principle was at work. Can they charm you while you wonder why they don't just move on, already? Well, when you've got Dean, there's no shortage of charm...
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 03:47 pm (UTC)Yay, vampires! I look forward to that. No doubt there will be an in-depth discussion of the similarities and differences and which construction I like better. (I like specific vampires on BtVS very much indeed, but in general I think the execution of them as a concept is pretty stupid.)
Well, when you've got Dean, there's no shortage of charm...
Pretty much.
I don't mind the family dynamics so much, I just wish they'd move a little faster.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 05:43 am (UTC)Yes.
>Or maybe an ep that's really all about the credit card fraud and the umpteen fake ID's.
Mostly yes.
>Or an ep where the supernatural thingy isn't really evil?
Yes.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 03:47 pm (UTC)*anticipates*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 05:46 am (UTC)I just typed other stuff then deleted it because it was spoilery. :-)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 03:50 pm (UTC)Aw, thank you. I'm sure it was highly insightful; you'll have to save it and tell me later. *g*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 06:02 pm (UTC)You haven't gotten to the good stuff with him yet, at least IMO. Hope that's not spoilery! ::is paranoid::
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 06:22 pm (UTC)Nah, you're good! I was certainly hoping there'd be more, to justify everyone's enthusiasm for him. :)
I do think the age thing is part of why John Winchester isn't striking me as attractive. As of S1 Jensen Ackles is just my age, and it feels very peculiar to me to think of Dean's dad in that light. It's the familial bond that's really screwing it up for me, I think, because I have no such difficulty with Giles despite the fatherly connotations of his relationship with Buffy.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 08:21 am (UTC)Not to mention that Dean is 6'2" and Sam is 6'4". Once Jared fills out in the later seasons, it's hard for Sam NOT to look threatening, LOL.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 10:59 pm (UTC)But Sam knows how to loom occasionally. Like the episode with Andy.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 04:21 pm (UTC)JP is just *huge.* Especially in later seasons. I'd insert a shirtless .gif, but I'm not sure if that would count as a spoiler. *g*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 05:04 pm (UTC)I hereby give you permission to insert a shirtless .gif. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 12:51 pm (UTC)I realize I'm jumping the gun and it's probably way too early to expect it, but I'm ready for this show to start telling different stories. Something more than "beat the evil bad spirit thingy, angst about John Winchester."
Hold on, kid. Just hold on.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 03:52 pm (UTC)*anticipates*
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 04:27 pm (UTC)Not saying it is a good perspective, but I'm guessing he probably means that with the boys he isn't able to do the things he needs to do, because they might get hurt (I have many more thoughts, and they connect with my last s5 rewatch post, but I shall not spoil).
I don't think they make him weaker by not pulling their own weight, more that he's their DAD, and he wants to be a hunter. He will always be dad first when they are there. I think he does trust them as hunters in their own right though- otherwise he wouldn't have sent them on so many missions alone.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 04:59 pm (UTC)Maybe? I guess that makes sense. I don't know. I think mostly I resent all the evasion, on the parts of both John and the writers. All John's reasoning so far has come across as a contrivance to draw the story out, and I hate that.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-18 01:26 pm (UTC)That is pretty much it in one. It's the idealisation of the individualistic American hero, much like in all noir. Masculinity issues, blah blah blah.
Of course, the Sam-Dean relationship overturns that, by emphasising that the most important thing is love/friendship. Dean is immensely screwed up because of John Winchester, but on some deep level, he genuinely understands that... I LOVE THAT BOY SO MUCH.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-18 05:39 pm (UTC)This show is actually super unique in that it doesn't rely on one hero (though John may think it does). Buffy, Angel, The Hunger Games, Harry Potter, LotR, many other examples I am too sleepless to recall ... you've got one, main hero and their sidekicks and friends. With SPN, you've got two brothers splitting the protagonist role, though it sometimes gets a little uneven.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 06:40 am (UTC)Isn't that the basic idea of every buddy movie ever, though? And I feel like there must be lots of shows that focus on the two cops who are partners, or whatever, although nothing's coming to mind at the moment.
Of course, mostly those sorts of things tend to involve more mundane heroics; are you specifically interested in the saving-the-world kind?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 06:51 am (UTC)Sure, you have buddy cops or, say, Mulder and Scully (though the show was skewed in favor of Mulder). But epics/fantasy stories tend to focus on one person and the way the handle Big-D Destiny.
His Dark Materials might come close to being another exception, but I think it's still one character that bears the brunt.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 07:06 am (UTC)