And in individual terms, I mostly just don’t care about him. However, I see intellectually a lot of the problems other folks have with him. I can sympathize. You’ve got your mysogyny, your patronization of the girlfriend, etc.
Yet I can’t deal with character bashing of Xander. Can’t. (This goes for pretty much every other character, too.) And thinking about it, I finally figured out for myself what I mean by character bashing: it means when a character is being nasty and that behavior is OOC. Warren Mears? I’m not sure it’s possible to bash him; he’s slime in the gutter already. Caleb ditto.
Xander lies, is mean and petty with most demons (especially Angel, whom he’s trying to compete with, and Spike, whom he just hates) and patronizing with Anya, and gets really nasty when he’s angry (see esp. Entropy). However.
However, I can’t see him torturing people, or even demons, without a whole lot more provocation than is usually given in fics of that type. I have difficulty imagining a personal crisis so intense that he would intentionally hurt Buffy or Willow or Giles.
I’m not saying it can’t be done. But I’m saying an author has to do a whole lot of work to get me there, and at the same time I need that darkening characterization to be leavened with the same humor and warmth and affection that I also see as part of Xander’s character.
If you must make Xander (or Angel, or Giles, who, given his S7 characterization plus what we know from Ats S5, is IMO actually the easiest character to take this route if you want to) the bad guy, then you have to do the footwork, or else I’ll just wrinkle my nose at you and move on.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-06 02:35 am (UTC)Well, yeah. I have almost as trouble with Xander causing Buffy relationship troubles as I do with him doing much more violent things, even though there's plenty of canonical evidence for it. I think it's partly because, as you say, it's awfully overdone, and partly it's because 'friends interfere with love life' is not a trope that interests me even a wee little bit. And using it with Buffy and Spike feels artificial, because it isn't like they don't have enough complications. Too often fic writers use Xander as a scapegoat for Spuffy difficulties and then sweep all the other, legit stuff under the rug. Which I hate! Spuffy is all about the complications, and the last thing I want is an easy resolution!
!!
!
It occurs to me that this is a major problem I have with bashing generally: it's so very often ship-driven. I have just about zero tolerance for poor characterization due to a shipping agenda, even if it's an agenda I agree with.
This is also, incidently, why it boggles me that there exist Spuffyites who think nobody hates Xander. Half of Spuffydom hates Xander; it's right there in the fic.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-06 02:38 am (UTC)Exactly, exactly!
And YES about ship-driven bashing. There's just no need for that, and I value IC a ton.
I think fandom at large really loves Xander, but you're right about Spuffydom, definitely.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-06 03:38 am (UTC)Word. Also: "Intervention." How do you get from "No one is judging you. It's understandable. Spike is strong and mysterious and sort of compact but well-muscled" to "Xander would throw a violent temper tantrum if Spike and Buffy got together"? I mean, unless Spike also boinks Xander's girlfriend in the fic, I'm not really seeing it. :-P
I have just about zero tolerance for poor characterization due to a shipping agenda, even if it's an agenda I agree with.
GAH SO MUCH WORD.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-06 04:38 am (UTC)Oh, Xander. I'll never ship Spander if I live to be a thousand, but it won't be the fault of lines like that.