It's (Human) Character of Color Month over at
still_grrr, to which I say, "Yay!" Maybe I'll finally get around to writing something about Forrest, which I've been threatening forever. At the very least, it ought to provide some Kendra fic for the housemate to read - she has a bit of a thing about Kendra.
But.
But one of the prompt characters for this week was Boyd from Dollhouse, and his very name made me (as
penny_lane_42 says) all stabby. Rarrrrr!
I still haven't summed up how I feel about the last half of S2 of Dollhouse; I think I need to rewatch Epitaph Two first, for one thing. However, I can talk about Boyd just fine.
Way back in the beginning of S1, Boyd looked like a fairly interesting character. Empathetic, yet culpable like all Dollhouse employees; idealistic and yet fully cognizant of what sort of place he's hired himself out to. As
dragonpaws pointed out to me early on, his relationship with Echo is like a darker, twisted version of the Watcher/Slayer relationship (or maybe W/S relationships as they are when the Slayer isn't Buffy).
Plus there were hints to all this backstory that we just know is sitting there under the surface. I can't remember how much of this is explicit and how much is implied, but the vibe I got was: ex-cop, morally compromised by something that went sour, possibly (per the phone call in "Belonging") with connections to a very dangerous element indeed.
And, there were moments of interest with many of the other characters: Topher trying to "save" him in "A Spy in the House of Love," his comments on Topher's "moral dilemma" in "Belonging," pretty much every interaction with Paul Ballard. (In fact, he was about the only character whose interaction with Ballard I actually enjoyed.)
So: morally conflicted! Sympathetic! Possible DH revolutionary! Interesting lense through which to see other characters!
And then, near the end of season two, we get our Big Surprise: Boyd is the evil mastermind of Rossum. Which, hmm. It's a bummer that this character we thought we liked turns out to be the big bad, but it could explain a lot of inexplicables if handled carefully.
Which: not. It only takes half an ep to confirm that Boyd's both clinically insane (and what does that development have to do with, well, anything about his character?) and a sillier, more over-the-top villain than even Caleb in Buffy S7. He smiles goofily and talks about Our Heroes as "family" and makes pretty much no sense whatever. He's a cartoon.
The writers killed his character. Suddenly, nothing that made him interesting is relevent anymore. All characterization is trumped by the nonsensical final twist. The only way I could ever enjoy even his early role on the show is to pretend that that final revelation never happened. And so, for the first time ever in a Whedon show, I find myself pointing and saying, "This is too stupid to be canon."
But.
But one of the prompt characters for this week was Boyd from Dollhouse, and his very name made me (as
I still haven't summed up how I feel about the last half of S2 of Dollhouse; I think I need to rewatch Epitaph Two first, for one thing. However, I can talk about Boyd just fine.
Way back in the beginning of S1, Boyd looked like a fairly interesting character. Empathetic, yet culpable like all Dollhouse employees; idealistic and yet fully cognizant of what sort of place he's hired himself out to. As
Plus there were hints to all this backstory that we just know is sitting there under the surface. I can't remember how much of this is explicit and how much is implied, but the vibe I got was: ex-cop, morally compromised by something that went sour, possibly (per the phone call in "Belonging") with connections to a very dangerous element indeed.
And, there were moments of interest with many of the other characters: Topher trying to "save" him in "A Spy in the House of Love," his comments on Topher's "moral dilemma" in "Belonging," pretty much every interaction with Paul Ballard. (In fact, he was about the only character whose interaction with Ballard I actually enjoyed.)
So: morally conflicted! Sympathetic! Possible DH revolutionary! Interesting lense through which to see other characters!
And then, near the end of season two, we get our Big Surprise: Boyd is the evil mastermind of Rossum. Which, hmm. It's a bummer that this character we thought we liked turns out to be the big bad, but it could explain a lot of inexplicables if handled carefully.
Which: not. It only takes half an ep to confirm that Boyd's both clinically insane (and what does that development have to do with, well, anything about his character?) and a sillier, more over-the-top villain than even Caleb in Buffy S7. He smiles goofily and talks about Our Heroes as "family" and makes pretty much no sense whatever. He's a cartoon.
The writers killed his character. Suddenly, nothing that made him interesting is relevent anymore. All characterization is trumped by the nonsensical final twist. The only way I could ever enjoy even his early role on the show is to pretend that that final revelation never happened. And so, for the first time ever in a Whedon show, I find myself pointing and saying, "This is too stupid to be canon."
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:06 pm (UTC)There are not enough yeses in the world and YES THIS MAKES ME STABBY, TOO!
My rage cannot be expressed in mere words. Here! Have a gif!
also:
On the other hand, E2 is genuinely awesome and full of great moments. WATCH IT.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:13 pm (UTC)I'm sorry I don't share your squee. :(
However: yay gifs!
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:17 pm (UTC)I'd given up on the themes long ago and I just wanted some real moments for my characters. So Topher, Alpha, Victor/Sierra, Mag and Zone, even Adelle--it was what I wanted. The whole "now look! We've magically fixed everything!" thing was pretty dumb. If I was still holding the show to high artistic standards...yeah, I would have been disappointed. But at that point I was over that and just wanted to see characters I care about have real moments. Does that make sense?
It's okay. I love you anyway.
I have soooo many gifs now. Especially of Buffy. They'll...probably be popping up pretty regularly.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:23 pm (UTC)So as an ep that I enjoyed and would be happy to rewatch, E2 is one of the better in the series. I guess I just still wanted more. Silly rabbit. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:29 pm (UTC)I guess I'll have to write more fic.Apparently, there are a lot of people who actually like Echo. I do not know who these people are, but they were voting on Fandom Steel Cage Match. And on off-site polls about fav characters. Blows my mind.
I don't blame you for wanting more at all. I just didn't let myself want more because I knew I'd be disappointed, you know?
And I'd be totally okay with that if the show hadn't made such pretensions about being an Idea Show instead of a Character Show. I never watch even actual Idea Shows as Idea Shows. I watch everything as Character Shows. ;D I guess I fail at TV? I can enjoy Idea Books or Idea Stories, even sometimes Idea Movies. But when it comes to TV, I want characters or I just don't care.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:39 pm (UTC)*leaps in* I loved to hate/dislike Echo, which probably isn't the same, but I thought she was brilliant as someone who thought she was the saviour of mankind, but was nevertheless ridiculously self-centred and incapable of realising that other people had different wants/needs to her. (Her dollification+slaughter of Boyd and dealing with Ballard's death by sticking him in her head were wonderfully terrible.)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:42 pm (UTC)As for the sticking-Ballard-in-her-head thing, WHAT. It was so ridiculous and so appropriate for their messed-up relationship, but I couldn't figure out if they were playing it straight or not. If I was supposed to think that was actually romantic and a good solution then DO NOT WANT. But if it was supposed to be totally messed up and really kind of stupid, then it's okay with me. Because it was messed up and stupid, just like them!
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:53 pm (UTC)Because it was messed up and stupid, just like them!
Exactly! I think Ballard's storyline was probably the best in the series (at least if you interpret it my way) - I thought Mellie's suicide was brilliantly on the mark as well, pointing out that she was always artificially created to make him happy, unlike the complete person Ballard's imprint allowed him to be. (I still can't get over his presumptuousness of saying to her that it was all right that they're both imprints...!)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:55 pm (UTC)Poor Mellie!
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 08:05 pm (UTC)I have to say that I watched because the series was Joss. There were certainly moments I liked, but the whole thing? Meh. The Boyd thing was a huge letdown, and I won't even get started on the rest of the plot twists... It's the only JW show I have no desire to rewatch, ever.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-04 12:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-04 12:40 am (UTC)BLEAH!
no subject
Date: 2010-04-04 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-04 02:53 am (UTC)