This may or may not be signficant
Jul. 27th, 2009 04:22 pmAnd yet, I still view the parts differently. The parts I love best, what grabbed hold of my brain and won't let go, are still Spike, his character arc, and his interaction with other folks on the show. When I write about Spike and other elements of later BtVS, I tend to write "from the ground," so to speak; I'm emotionally invested in the fictional reality of the story I'm telling. I'm interested in the characters as people - just, yanno, fictional ones.
Whereas when I'm writing about early BtVS - basically just S2 at this point - I seem to worry a lot more about themes and symbolism and all that literary junk. This was especially true of Abandon Hope, which was practically nothing but meta. I tend to think things through more abstractly, and am much less emotionally engaged. I'm analyzing, not role-playing. It's not that I don't find the early seasons interesting; I like S2 more every time I watch it. It's just that I don't seem to interact with it the way I do with, say, S5.
Of course, I don't have much of a sample set yet. In particular, my two S2 pieces were both written for other people, and they both have a more formal structure than the rest of my stuff. So maybe this is just coincidence? Or maybe it's simply that I've never been as emotionally engaged by S2 (or S3, or most of S4) as I am by events later in the series.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 09:37 pm (UTC)Yeah. He doesn't exist in a vacuum - he needs all that context for him to make sense.