First: I've reached a point on this blog where it seems reasonable to refer to events from the first five seasons or so of SPN without spoiler cuts. I say "reasonable" because almost half my flist is SPN people now, I think, and I have the impression that all my other people who might have wanted to see SPN have done so by now. (Excepting
gryfndor_godess and
bruttimabuoni - don't worry, everything post-S5 will still behind a cut.)
Before I do so, though, is there anyone else who'd rather I kept putting all SPN spoilers behind cuts? People who might conceivably want to watch the show in the future and remain unspoiled until then?
So, the canon question: do we think Ruby had any idea what Lucifer's plans for Sam were post-S4? After all, we didn't find out about the vessel plan until, what, 5.03?
Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (
DW replies)
Before I do so, though, is there anyone else who'd rather I kept putting all SPN spoilers behind cuts? People who might conceivably want to watch the show in the future and remain unspoiled until then?
So, the canon question: do we think Ruby had any idea what Lucifer's plans for Sam were post-S4? After all, we didn't find out about the vessel plan until, what, 5.03?
Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 07:49 pm (UTC)The last thing Ruby says to Sam is:
Because... because it had to be you, Sammy. It always had to be you. You saved us. You set him free. And he's gonna be
grateful. He's gonna repay you in ways that you can't even imagine.
It's ambiguous there.
If she knows... for Ruby the zealot, being burned up in a possession by Lucifer could be seen as a desirable outcome, so she might genuinely believe it's a reward. Or, she's a demon; maybe she's lying, and just trying to persuade Sam it'll be okay so he'll be open to Lucifer's requests.
If she doesn't know, she may believe Lucifer would be, if not a benevolent god, then at least one willing to reward good behaviour, and that she and Sam are both in for good things. Or even just trying to save herself, given that Sam just tried to zap her with the same powers he used up killing Lilith.
Then there's also the question of whether Ruby has come to care about Sam or not. I know what I like to believe, and most of the time it's that Ruby does care about Sam in some way and didn't have the full story re possession. But there's a certain appealing horror in the idea that she might care about him but be willing to see him burned up for the cause anyway :).
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 09:12 pm (UTC)Whether Ruby thinks being burned up in a possession is an outcome to be desired, I don't know. It's really frustrating that we get so little of her reasoning; we only see real genuine Ruby in that one scene, and she doesn't get much time. So I don't know if she's the kind of Lucifer-fanatic who thinks burning out for his glory would be the best thing ever, or whether she's fundamentally interested in her advancement and sees Lucifer as the primo opportunity. Although, she seemed to be fairly devoted to Lilith, and she worked really hard to get Sam to the point of killing Lilith, which suggests that Ruby's okay with death as a person's final reward.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 10:02 pm (UTC)I am of the opinion that Ruby really cared about Sam--maybe not originally, but certainly by, say, halfway through S4. She just cared about letting Lucifer out more.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 08:59 pm (UTC)I'm still so damn confused by Ruby and what she knew that I have no answer to your question.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 09:08 pm (UTC)I also believe that if Dean had not shown up Sam might have been swayed by Ruby and Lucifer to say yes. It would have been interesting if the book version with out Dean and Castiels interference would have shown up for them to read.
My question is how was Nick a vessel enough to fill in?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 09:17 pm (UTC)Mm, that's a thought I hadn't had before! I like that idea.
Re: Nick, he clearly wasn't enough of a vessel to fill-in long-term; he was disintegrating by the end of S5 (and also maybe Lucifer couldn't use all his powers yet, while still in Nick? I mean, we don't see him using many angel powers during S5).
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 09:28 pm (UTC)That's a really good question. My initial reaction was to say, it's a bloodline, he must be a distant relative. But then I remembered the Campbells, who aren't terribly distant relatives at all, so wouldn't they have been better?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 09:56 pm (UTC)This is why I generally think of S6 as fanfic. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 11:11 pm (UTC)So it came down to the practical issues. He was looking for a vessel ASAP before Michael could have him stuffed back in the hole. IIRC, Lucifer was raised in Maryland and Nick lived in Delaware. Finding Nick would be a lot easier than going halfway across the continent to locate (and possibly raise from the dead) a Campbell just for the sake of finding a Campbell.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-15 11:01 pm (UTC)hm, torn. I'm having a tough time picturing Lucifer letting any of his lackeys in on the intricacies of the vessel thing. He probably had to tell Azazel something to have the Special Children identified properly, and since demons know how possession and vessel-ing works, the inner circle might have put two and two together. I don't think Ruby was letting herself think the plan through by the end there, though, since she'd bonded with Sam and wanted so badly to believe that things would be okay for them.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-27 05:48 pm (UTC)*nod* Agreed.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-16 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-27 05:49 pm (UTC)