Page Summary
next_to_normal - (no subject) +3 responses
brutti-ma-buoni.livejournal.com - (no subject) +1 response
rahirah - (no subject) +1 response
penny-lane-42.livejournal.com - (no subject) +3 responses
bobthemole.livejournal.com - (no subject) +1 response
cafedemonde.livejournal.com - (no subject) +1 response
slaymesoftly.livejournal.com - (no subject) +2 responses
deird1 - (no subject)
deird1 - (no subject)
quinara - (no subject)
seapealsh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Nadeshiko for ColorSide by
- Resources: Stock.XCHNG
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 02:54 pm (UTC)ETA: Here's an explanation that says "different than" is only correct when comparing a noun and a clause. Therefore, it'd be incorrect to use it in your example. There's also this breakdown of usage which indicates that "different to" is more common in the UK but virtually unheard of in the US.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 04:23 pm (UTC)Weird how prepositions wander, isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 04:52 pm (UTC)But "different to" makes me want to stick super-sharp pencils in my ears. I imagine that it might be a British thing, and usually I prefer British uses, but this is like nails on a chalkboard to me.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-19 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-20 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-20 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 07:32 pm (UTC)I don't know about regional, but it is apparently an American/British divide.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-20 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-20 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 08:22 pm (UTC)I believe it's a regional thing. Personally, I'd say that "different to" and "different from" are both fine - and "different than" sounds insane.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 08:26 pm (UTC)Fowler's Modern English says:
different from - is from 1590
different to - 1526
different than - 1644
All three are acceptable English usage. But "than" is more likely to be American, "from" is more likely to be British, and the rest of the world is most likely to use "to".
no subject
Date: 2010-04-18 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-19 03:31 am (UTC)