So here's a thing about SPN
Mar. 28th, 2011 10:52 pmI love our boys, right? And the vast majority of the time they've got good intentions and solid motives, and what they do saves the day and a few people besides. In fact, they're really good at what they do. They're so good - at staying under the radar, at breaking and entering and forging ID's and sweet-talking whoever they need to - that even Andy Gallagher, who can "Obi-Wan" people into doing whatever he wants, is hardly more powerful than the Winchesters. Short of one particularly nasty demon and his hellish hordes, nothing keeps these guys down. They charm people into believing anything. People trust them implicitly on the slimmest of evidence.
Now, they're not going to rape the teenage girl who sneaks them into her bedroom to keep the ghosts away, and they're not betraying the stewardess's trust even when they slam her colleague on the floor and start splashing him with what looks like acid... but they could be. No one to stop them.
And that? Is very disturbing.
Now, they're not going to rape the teenage girl who sneaks them into her bedroom to keep the ghosts away, and they're not betraying the stewardess's trust even when they slam her colleague on the floor and start splashing him with what looks like acid... but they could be. No one to stop them.
And that? Is very disturbing.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 06:26 am (UTC)They are good at pushing past people's boundaries. And as some-stuff-I-read-today suggests men are, on average, less likely than women to see that as a problem.
Egads, this is SUCH a Guy Show.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 06:36 am (UTC)Also, my understanding is that Ted Bundy could make people trust him after just a few minutes of acquaintance. Sometimes I want to roll back all these crazy social advances, such as people under the age of, oh, 35 or so going about unchaperoned...
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 01:44 pm (UTC)Related: I once remember reading a post about how the Winchesters get away with what they do because of white male privelege. If they were Black or Hispanic, people wouldn't believe that they're supposed to be where they say they are so easily. OTOH, if they were women, they'd have an even EASIER time, because no one thinks women can be problems.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 01:45 pm (UTC)But on cop shows? It *really* bothers me when they try to batter subjects before they call in lawyers/ use the Patriot Act to get personal information/skirt the edges of legality to catch someone and/or prove their guilt. I understand that a show in which suspects are arrested and immediately request a lawyer would be boring, but I don't like feeling that I'm supposed to root for people employing somewhat dirty tactics or think that The Patriot Act is helping me avoid rape.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-29 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 02:23 am (UTC)(Except for a lot of Dean's characterization, which seems to me in direct opposition to standard Guy Characterization. Actually, I expect true Guy Shows to spend a lot less time on character development in general than this one does.)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 02:26 am (UTC)I'm actually pretty confused about why they haven't already possessed the Winchesters. It'd have been a whole lot easier to get the Colt that way than all this deal-making and other rigmarole.
But yes. Would not want them possessed or, even worse, more or less themselves but under some kind of evil guiding influence.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-30 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 01:25 am (UTC)Maybe. I mean, I don't consider myself strongly feminist, but I do read a lot of stuff on LJ and so forth. OTOH, I had similar issues with Veronica's cavalier lying and violation of others' privacy on Veronica Mars. Possibly my law-abiding tendency just goes deeper than I realized. :)
OTOH, if they were women, they'd have an even EASIER time, because no one thinks women can be problems.
Then again, if they were women they'd have a lot of other new problems - less physical strength and stature, less intimidation factor when they needed one, less automatic respect, more hassling.
V. good point about the race thing, though.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 01:26 am (UTC)Yes. We have laws for a reason, people! Because philosophically we actually think they're a good idea and should apply to everyone.
Hmph.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 01:33 am (UTC)Well, maybe just one of them could be a girl. :) How about a brother and sister team who save people and hunt things?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 01:40 am (UTC)Though rather a lot of them tend to be Wincest, it seems.
ETA: And I have enough AU projects right now. :) I'm actually about to make a post about one.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-31 01:42 am (UTC)