Mar. 7th, 2012

snick_backup: (Anya final stand)
This post isn't directed an at a specific person or group of people, on my flist or off. It's not directed at any particular fandom. It's directed at fandom, the whole messy glorious group consciousness that I love.

When I started out in fandom, I wrote genfic, and here's the reason: my life is a genfic. I have a family I love and a handful of friendships - some of them right here in fandom! - that mean the world to me. And do you know what one thing none of these relationships need?

Sex.

Sex is not the automatic improvement to any given human interaction. 'Sexual' doesn't always mean 'better' or even 'more'; sometimes sex is a subtraction, not an addition. That a relationship is not sexual does not inherently imply that it is lacking; that it is less satisfying, worthwhile, meaningful, robust, or interesting; that it is somehow "not enough."

I've never seen any blanket argument to this effect, and I think even the most enthusiastic of multishippers have a few ships they prefer non-romantically. But the cumulative effect of fandom is to imply that every relationship is better / more interesting with sex.

Sex, fandom, is not the cherry on top of every relationship. It is not the sweet necessity without which no sundae is complete.

So you can stop telling me it is. Any day now.

Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (comment count unavailable DW replies)
snick_backup: (Anya final stand)
This post isn't directed an at a specific person or group of people, on my flist or off. It's not directed at any particular fandom. It's directed at fandom, the whole messy glorious group consciousness that I love.

When I started out in fandom, I wrote genfic, and here's the reason: my life is a genfic. I have a family I love and a handful of friendships - some of them right here in fandom! - that mean the world to me. And do you know what one thing none of these relationships need?

Sex.

Sex is not the automatic improvement to any given human interaction. 'Sexual' doesn't always mean 'better' or even 'more'; sometimes sex is a subtraction, not an addition. That a relationship is not sexual does not inherently imply that it is lacking; that it is less satisfying, worthwhile, meaningful, robust, or interesting; that it is somehow "not enough."

I've never seen any blanket argument to this effect, and I think even the most enthusiastic of multishippers have a few ships they prefer non-romantically. But the cumulative effect of fandom is to imply that every relationship is better / more interesting with sex.

Sex, fandom, is not the cherry on top of every relationship. It is not the sweet necessity without which no sundae is complete.

So you can stop telling me it is. Any day now.

Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (comment count unavailable DW replies)
snick_backup: (Willow hmm)
Why is the juggernaut pairing in a fandom not called the flagship?

Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (comment count unavailable DW replies)
snick_backup: (Willow hmm)
Why is the juggernaut pairing in a fandom not called the flagship?

Original entry posted at Dreamwidth. Feel free to reply here or there. (comment count unavailable DW replies)

Profile

snick_backup: (Default)
snick_backup

2025

S M T W T F S

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 14th, 2025 02:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios